For Reviewers
For detailed information about the peer review process, please visit our Peer Review page. As a reviewer, it is important to provide accurate personal and professional information that reflects your expertise. Please ensure that your contact information is up to date.
As a peer reviewer at SciFormat Publishing, you play a vital role in maintaining the integrity and quality of the scholarly publication process. We adhere to the ethical guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to ensure a fair, transparent, and constructive peer review process. This page provides important information and guidelines to help you fulfill your responsibilities as a reviewer.
Key Responsibilities of Reviewers:
- Confidentiality and Anonymity:
Maintain strict confidentiality and ensure the anonymity of both the authors and reviewers throughout the review process. Do not disclose any details about the manuscript or your role as a reviewer to anyone without prior authorization from the journal. - Objectivity and Impartiality:
Conduct the review objectively, without any personal, professional, or financial biases. Focus solely on the scientific merits of the manuscript and provide fair and constructive feedback to the authors. Avoid making derogatory or inflammatory remarks and maintain a respectful and professional tone in your comments. - Timeliness and Responsiveness:
Adhere to the agreed-upon timelines for completing the review. If you anticipate delays or are unable to complete the review within the given timeframe, promptly notify the editor to allow for appropriate adjustments in the review process. Timely reviews are crucial in ensuring the efficiency of the publication process. - Conflict of Interest:
Disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may compromise your impartiality in reviewing the manuscript. If you feel that you are not qualified to review the manuscript or have a personal or professional relationship with the authors that may influence your judgment, inform the editor immediately and recuse yourself from the review process. - Ethical Considerations:
Assess the manuscript for any ethical concerns, such as plagiarism, data fabrication, or undisclosed conflicts of interest. If you identify any such issues, notify the editor and provide detailed comments outlining your concerns. Additionally, alert the editor if you suspect the manuscript may have been previously published or is under consideration elsewhere. - Constructive Feedback:
Provide clear, specific, and constructive feedback to the authors to help improve the quality of their work. Identify the manuscript's strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement, and offer suggestions for further research or clarification where appropriate. Your feedback should be objective, constructive, and focused on enhancing the scientific rigor and clarity of the manuscript. - Honesty and Transparency:
Ensure the accuracy and validity of your review by citing relevant sources and providing proper references to support your comments and recommendations. Avoid making unsupported claims or personal opinions. If you have previously reviewed a related manuscript or are aware of similar work, disclose this information to the editor for appropriate action.
As a peer reviewer at SciFormat Publishing, your adherence to ethical guidelines is crucial in maintaining the integrity and quality of the peer review process. Your commitment to confidentiality, objectivity, and constructive feedback is instrumental in ensuring the publication of high-quality research. By upholding these ethical standards, you contribute to the advancement of knowledge and the scholarly community as a whole.
We appreciate your dedication and valuable contributions as a reviewer. Thank you for your commitment to responsible research publication and for playing an essential role in shaping the scientific discourse.
Please note that additional guidelines specific to the review process at SciFormat Publishing may be provided to reviewers for each manuscript assigned.