Peer Review Process

Contemporary Issues in Artificial Intelligence implements a single-blind peer review process, a model where the identity of the reviewers is kept anonymous while the authors' identities are disclosed to the reviewers. This process aims to mitigate bias and ensure that manuscripts are evaluated solely on their merit and relevance to the journal's thematic scope.

The Peer Review Process

  1. Initial Manuscript Assessment:

    • Each submission undergoes a preliminary review by the Editor to ensure compliance with our submission guidelines, including an originality and plagiarism check. Manuscripts that do not meet the journal's standards or submission criteria are rejected at this stage.

  2. Reviewer Selection:

    • The Editor identifies and invites potential reviewers who are experts in the manuscript's subject area. This careful selection ensures that the review process is thorough and fair.

  3. Review Process:

    • Assigned reviewers independently assess the manuscript, focusing on its scientific accuracy, contribution to the field, ethical considerations, and adherence to the journal's standards.
    • Reviewers provide detailed feedback and recommend one of the following actions to the Editor: Reject, Consider after Major Changes, Consider after Minor Changes, or Publish Unaltered.

  4. Decisions and Revisions:

    • In cases of rejection, authors are notified and provided with the review feedback.
    • If revisions are required, authors are given clear instructions on the necessary changes. Revised manuscripts may undergo additional review rounds before a final decision is made.
    • Manuscripts recommended for publication after minor or no changes undergo a final review by the Editor to ensure they align with SciFormat Publishing's policies and standards.

  5. Final Decision:

    • Upon acceptance, authors are informed, and the manuscript proceeds to publication.

Ethical Guidelines

Our peer review process is guided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) principles, ensuring integrity, confidentiality, and fairness throughout. Reviewers are expected to:

  • Conduct reviews ethically, maintaining confidentiality and avoiding conflicts of interest.
  • Assess manuscripts objectively, providing constructive feedback to support the authors and improve the quality of the publication.
  • Report any suspicions of ethical violations or misconduct according to COPE guidelines.

For more detailed ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, including responsibilities and best practices, please refer to our "For Reviewers" page, which is aligned with COPE's Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers.

Commitment to Excellence

Contemporary Issues in Artificial Intelligence is committed to upholding the highest standards of peer review, contributing to the integrity and quality of scientific publishing. Our process is designed to be transparent, fair, and efficient, ensuring that each manuscript is evaluated on its merits and contributions to the field of artificial intelligence.

Transparency and Feedback

  • Open Communication: The journal encourages open communication between the editors and reviewers during the review process, while maintaining the confidentiality of the review.
  • Constructive Criticism: Reviewers are encouraged to provide constructive feedback that is both supportive and critical, aimed at enhancing the manuscript's quality and the author's understanding of the review process.
  • Feedback to Reviewers: To maintain a high standard of review, our journal provides feedback to reviewers, acknowledging their contributions and offering guidance on best reviewing practices when necessary.

Ensuring Quality and Integrity

  • Adherence to Standards: The review process is rigorously monitored to ensure adherence to scientific, ethical, and publishing standards set forth by SciFormat Publishing and the broader scientific community.
  • Continuous Improvement: The journal regularly reviews and updates its peer review processes and policies to incorporate best practices and address emerging challenges in scholarly publishing.

Support for Reviewers

  • Resources and Training: SciFormat Publishing offers resources and training to reviewers, including access to guidelines and workshops on ethical peer review, to ensure they are well-equipped to conduct their reviews effectively and ethically.
  • Recognition of Reviewers: The contributions of reviewers are invaluable to the journal's success. We acknowledge their efforts through various recognition programs, including listing on the journal's website and certificates of contribution.

Reviewer Diversity and Inclusion

  • Broadening Participation: The journal strives to include a diverse range of reviewers from different geographic locations, institutions, and backgrounds to reflect the wide scope of the journal and ensure a variety of perspectives in the review process.
  • Inclusivity in Reviewing: We are committed to fostering an inclusive environment where all reviewers feel valued and respected for their contributions, irrespective of their race, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or other aspects of their identity.

The peer review process at Contemporary Issues in Artificial Intelligence is foundational to our mission of advancing knowledge and understanding within the field of artificial intelligence. By adhering to the highest standards of ethical conduct and scholarly rigor, we ensure the publication of quality research that is accessible, relevant, and beneficial to the scientific community and society at large. Our commitment to excellence, integrity, and transparency in the peer review process reflects our dedication to contributing positively to the scholarly discourse on artificial intelligence.