For Reviewers

For detailed information about the peer review process, please visit our Peer Review Process page. As a reviewer, it is important to provide accurate personal and professional information that reflects your expertise. Please ensure that your contact information is up to date.

We adhere to the ethical guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to ensure a fair, transparent, and constructive peer review process. This page provides important information and guidelines to help you fulfill your responsibilities as a reviewer.

The role of a peer reviewer in the Contemporary Issues in Artificial Intelligence journal, under SciFormat Publishing, is critical in maintaining the integrity, transparency, and quality of scholarly research. These guidelines encapsulate the ethical, procedural, and evaluative standards expected from reviewers, reflecting the journal's commitment to fostering significant scientific discourse within the AI community. Through a meticulous review process, reviewers ensure that each submission is rigorously assessed, contributing to the advancement of knowledge and ethical practices in artificial intelligence.

  • Commitment to Professional Responsibility: Reviewers for the Contemporary Issues in Artificial Intelligence journal are entrusted with a pivotal role in maintaining the integrity of scholarly communication. It is imperative that they acknowledge their professional duty to contribute constructively to the peer-review process. This responsibility includes providing accurate, fair, and unbiased assessments of manuscripts based on their expertise. Reviewers should ensure their contact information is up-to-date and accurately reflects their areas of expertise, allowing editors to match manuscripts with the most appropriate reviewers. Recognizing the importance of this role, reviewers must approach their assignments with dedication, recognizing that they are crucial to the advancement of knowledge in artificial intelligence and its ethical considerations.
  • Handling Conflicts of Interest: The integrity of the review process is paramount, necessitating that reviewers transparently declare any potential conflicts of interest that might influence their evaluations. This includes, but is not limited to, financial, intellectual, personal, or professional conflicts. Should a reviewer find themselves in a position of potential bias due to recent collaborations, institutional affiliations, or personal relationships with the authors, it is their duty to recuse themselves from the review process. This transparency is essential to preserve the fairness and impartiality of the peer-review process, ensuring that manuscripts are judged solely on their scientific merit and relevance to the journal's scope.
  • Adherence to Confidentiality and Ethical Considerations: Reviewers are expected to uphold the highest standards of confidentiality and ethical conduct throughout the review process. The information contained within manuscripts is privileged, and reviewers must refrain from using this knowledge for personal gain or to discredit others. Involving others in the review, such as mentees or colleagues, should only be done with explicit permission from the journal, ensuring that all contributions are properly acknowledged. Furthermore, reviewers should remain vigilant for signs of ethical misconduct, including plagiarism, fabrication of data, and duplicate submission, and report any concerns to the journal editor in line with COPE guidelines.
  • Constructive and Timely Feedback: The cornerstone of effective peer review is the provision of constructive, comprehensive, and timely feedback. Reviewers are encouraged to provide detailed comments that highlight both the strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript, offering clear, evidence-based suggestions for improvement. This feedback should be delivered in a respectful and supportive manner, avoiding personal criticism or bias. Timeliness in completing reviews is critical to the advancement of scholarly work; thus, reviewers should adhere to the agreed-upon deadlines, or communicate promptly with the journal if an extension is needed.
  • Continuous Engagement and Improvement: Reviewers for Contemporary Issues in Artificial Intelligence play a crucial role in the ongoing dialogue within the AI community. They are encouraged to remain engaged with the journal and the broader scholarly conversation, participating in opportunities for training and mentorship to refine their reviewing skills. The journal values the diversity of perspectives that a broad reviewer base brings, striving for inclusivity in reviewer selection. This commitment to excellence, integrity, and transparency in the review process reflects SciFormat Publishing's dedication to fostering rigorous, ethical research in artificial intelligence and related fields.
  • Promotion of Transparency and Integrity: Reviewers are pivotal in promoting the transparency and integrity of the peer-review process for the Contemporary Issues in Artificial Intelligence journal. Their role extends beyond mere evaluation to ensuring that the review process itself adheres to the highest standards of scholarly integrity. Reviewers should encourage authors to provide complete and reproducible methodologies, and where applicable, to share data for the benefit of broader scientific inquiry. The commitment to rigorous, ethical review practices is not only about upholding the standards of the journal but also about advancing the field of artificial intelligence in a manner that is open, ethical, and transparent. This approach fosters a scientific ecosystem where innovation, integrity, and quality are paramount.
  • Supporting the Ethos of Open Science: As part of SciFormat Publishing's dedication to Open Science, reviewers are encouraged to support the principles of accessibility, transparency, and reproducibility. This includes advocating for the open dissemination of research findings, supporting the use of preprints, and encouraging authors to deposit data in accessible repositories. Reviewers play a critical role in shaping the landscape of artificial intelligence research by promoting practices that increase the reach and impact of research findings. This alignment with the ethos of Open Science ensures that the research not only advances the field but also remains accessible to a wide audience, including researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.

In essence, the guidelines for reviewers at Contemporary Issues in Artificial Intelligence serve as a beacon for maintaining the highest standards of scholarly integrity and constructive critique. Reviewers play a pivotal role not just in evaluating the scientific merit of submissions but in upholding the ethos of Open Science, ethical conduct, and diversity in scholarly communication. Their invaluable contributions ensure the continuous evolution and responsible application of AI technologies, reinforcing the journal's mission to influence policy, guide research directions, and inspire future innovations within the global scientific community.

Reviewer's Benefits

At SciFormat Publishing, we deeply value the contributions of our peer reviewers in upholding the high standards of our publication, especially within the Contemporary Issues in Artificial Intelligence journal. Recognizing the pivotal role reviewers play, we offer unique benefits tailored to enrich their professional journey and acknowledge their vital contributions to the scientific community. Below are detailed insights into the specific advantages we provide to our reviewers, designed to support their career development, enhance their research impact, and foster a vibrant academic dialogue within the artificial intelligence field.

  • Credibility Boost: Serving as a peer reviewer for Contemporary Issues in Artificial Intelligence significantly enhances your professional reputation within the AI research community. This role is a testament to your expertise and commitment to the field, showcasing your dedication to advancing scientific knowledge and ethical practices.
  • Editorial Opportunities: Participation in the peer review process opens the door to further professional opportunities, such as editorial roles or advisory board positions within SciFormat Publishing. This not only expands your influence in shaping the future of AI research but also enriches your professional portfolio.
  • CPD Recognition: Engaging in peer review counts towards Continuing Professional Development (CPD) requirements, acknowledging the time and effort you invest in this scholarly activity. This recognition supports your career progression and professional development in academia or industry.
  • Certification and Acknowledgment: SciFormat Publishing values the essential contributions of its reviewers. In recognition, we provide certificates and public acknowledgment on our platform, offering tangible proof of your service to the community and enhancing your academic profile.
  • Exclusive Research Insights: As a reviewer, you gain early access to the latest findings and innovative methodologies in AI, before they become widely available. This privilege not only keeps you at the forefront of your field but also inspires your research, teaching, and professional practice.
  • Editorial Appreciation Program: At SciFormat Publishing, we express our gratitude towards reviewers by offering a special privilege. Reviewers who act as corresponding authors have the opportunity to publish one article free of charge within the span of a year, following the submission of a peer-review report. This approach is designed to honor their crucial contribution to the academic community by facilitating the dissemination of valuable research insights.

SciFormat Publishing deeply values the expertise and dedication of our reviewers. The benefits offered underscore our commitment to recognizing their contributions to the scientific community and supporting their academic and professional growth. We believe that by fostering a collaborative and supportive environment, we can collectively advance the frontiers of knowledge in artificial intelligence and beyond. Thank you to all our reviewers for their unwavering commitment to excellence and integrity in scholarly publishing.